The Obama administration is playing with fire at the UN Security Council, actively considering the idea of capitulating to Arab demands over a resolution on Gaza. Now on the table are draft versions from the United States, Europe and Jordan/the Arab group.
The Europeans are pushing for the introduction of an "international monitoring and verification mission" in Gaza that would supposedly ensure the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. What it would actually do is prevent Israel from exercising the right of self-defense against Hamas attacks emanating from Gaza in the future, since the international personnel would immediately serve as human shields for Palestinian terrorists. The European proposed mission would also supposedly investigate and report on violations, despite the reality that UN missions in other Arab countries (such as Lebanon) have never satisfactorily fulfilled similar mandates.
The United States draft resolution asks Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to develop options for a verification mechanism for "dual-use" materials - such as concrete - that Israel would be expected to allow into Gaza. That's the same Secretary-General who spent the 50-day war slandering Israel with the charge of deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians.
The United States holds the presidency of the Security Council for the month of September and may view a Gaza resolution as a "victory" during its tenure. The frequent course of UN diplomacy is to expect the U.S. to capitulate to European demands as a faux "middle-ground." Moreover, it would not be the first time that the Obama administration played protecting Israel against international coalition-building on other fronts.