"Last Friday, on the eve of Hanukkah and Christmas, Barack Obama stabbed Israel in the front. The departing president refused to veto United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334-a measure ostensibly about Israeli settlement policy, but clearly intended to tip the peace process toward the Palestinians. Its adoption wasn't pretty. But, sadly, it was predictable...
Mr. Obama argues that Resolution 2334 continues a bipartisan American policy toward the Middle East. It does precisely the opposite. The White House has abandoned any pretense that the actual parties to the conflict must resolve their differences. Instead, the president has essentially endorsed the Palestinian politico-legal narrative about territory formerly under League of Nations' mandate, but not already under Israeli control after the 1948-49 war of independence...
There can be no "land for peace"-with Israel retroceding territory in exchange for peace, as in the 1979 Camp David agreement with Egypt-if the land is not legitimately Israel's to give up in the first place. Anti-Israel imagineers have used this linguistic jujitsu as their central tactic since 1967, trying to create 'facts on the ground' in the U.N.'s corridors rather than by actually negotiating with Israel. Mr. Obama has given them an indefinite hall pass.
The Trump administration could veto future Security Council measures that extend Resolution 2334 (e.g., purportedly recognizing a Palestinian state). Mr. Trump could also veto efforts to implement Resolution 2334 (e.g., the sanctions for what it calls Israel's "blatant violation under international law"). Still, there are significant dangers. Other U.N. bodies, such as the General Assembly and the numerous specialized agencies where America has no veto, can carry Resolution 2334 forward.
Even more perilous is that individual nations or the European Union can legislate their own sanctions under Resolution 2334's provision that 'all States' should 'distinguish in their relevant dealings' between Israel's territory 'and the territories occupied since 1967.' This is a hunting license to ostracize Israel from the international economic system, exposing it and its citizens to incalculable personal and financial risk.
Once in office, President Trump should act urgently to mitigate or reverse Resolution 2334's consequences. Mr. Obama has made this significantly harder by rendering America complicit in assaulting Israel. Nonetheless, handled properly, there is an escape from both the current danger zone and the wasteland in which the search for Middle East peace has long wandered.
First, there must be consequences for the adoption of Resolution 2334. The Trump administration should move to repeal the resolution, giving the 14 countries that supported it a chance to correct their error. Nations that affirm their votes should have their relations with Washington adjusted accordingly. In some cases this might involve vigorous diplomatic protests. But the main perpetrators in particular should face more tangible consequences.
As for the United Nations itself, if this mistake is not fixed the U.S. should withhold at least its assessed contributions to the U.N.-which amount to about $3 billion annually or 22%-25% of its total regular and peacekeeping budgets...
It is now up to Mr. Trump to pivot away from his predecessor's disastrous policies on Israel. Taking up the challenge will be difficult, but well worth the effort for America and its friends world-wide."