"The United Nations is raping children. The facilitation of these child rapes is in part funded by the UK taxpayer...
Earlier this month, UN Secretary General António Guterres in releasing the 2016 UN annual review said that there were 145 cases of sexual exploitation and abuse involving troops and civilians across all UN peace missions in 2016 alone. The United Nations Secretary General is talking about his own organisation.
These 145 cases involved 311 victims and even the UN recognises that this is the tip of the iceberg. Many of the victims, by the UN's own admission, are children...
The UN's language is interesting here. It is wishy-washy as if child rape were a problem that needed to be minimised, not wiped out.
'I fully recognise that no magic wand exists to end the problem of sexual exploitation and abuse,' Guterres said. 'Nevertheless, I believe that we can dramatically improve how the United Nations addresses this scourge.'
'Dramatically improve' the situation? He is kidding right? What about wiping it out?...
What is a better term than 'sexual abuse' of the 14-year-old child, together with her 18-year-old friend, set upon by UN peacekeepers near Bambari airport in Central African Republic late in 2015?
This is not 'sexual abuse'. This is the gang rape of a child. It is neither 'sexual abuse' nor an 'indiscretion'. It is not something to be 'minimised'. It is something to be wiped out with brutal efficiency...
I used to work for the UN. As my close friends will tell you, one of the reasons I left the UN is because I call them the second largest harbourer of paedophiles behind only the Catholic Church. But maybe I am wrong. Maybe the UN is worse..."